Operational-Investigative Activities of Judicial Authorization: Features of Performance

The scientific article is devoted to the study of issues related peculiarities performing operational-investigative activities judicial authorization enshrined in Federal Law “On activities” questions and restrictions on constitutional rights citizens, connected with them, are raised. Performing activities, requiring authorization, impossible without clear knowledge understanding not only but also decisions both Constitutional Court European Human Rights. Understanding these documents makes it possible competently fully, compliance all requirements law, draw up necessary obtain permission a court, clearly determine which activity should be conducted each case, taking into account technical other features itself allocated funds. Purpose: conduct authorization; analyze legislation governing specifics powers subjects operationalinvestigative when considered activities. As methods methodology conducting work, formal-logical dialectical methods, sociological, historical were used. based theoretical, method, set techniques for legal status an official, theory authorities, comparative analysis legislative norms. main methodological approach used legislation, developed works Russian lawyers. Main results: made identify advantages disadvantages regulatory framework as well significant errors law enforcement practice. Conclusions substantiation novelty work: activities”, insufficient elaboration regulation substantiated. ways solving existing problems proposed, including by amending current